When stress testing our loadbalancer, i was unable to get more than 20 reliable ssh connections. The following error would be reported.
ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
The resolution for this is quite simple.
Edit the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file and increase the MaxStartups. On my server i set this to 200.
Edit /etc/sysctrl.conf and add the following line:
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 3000
Then apply this change:
# sysctl -p
Here is a simple shell script to copy your ssh authorization key to a remote machine so that you can run ssh and scp without having to repeatedly login.
#!/bin/sh
# save in file ssh_copykeyto.sh then chmod +x ssh_copykeyto.sh
KEY="$HOME/.ssh/id_rsa.pub"
if [ ! -f ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub ];then
echo "private key not found at $KEY"
echo "create it with "ssh-keygen -t rsa" before running this script
exit
fi
if [ -z $1 ];then
echo "Bad args: specify user@host as the first argument to this script"
exit
fi
echo "Copying ssh authorization key to $1... "
KEYCODE=`cat $KEY`
ssh -q $1 "mkdir ~/.ssh 2>/dev/null; chmod 700 ~/.ssh; echo "$KEYCODE" >> ~/.ssh/authorized_keys; \ chmod 644 ~/.ssh/authorized_keys"
echo "done!"
RTOS()
Syntax
RTOS( [ <workarea> ] )Description
The RTOS() function returns all the fields in the current row as a string. The string will begin with the unique row identifier and then the deleted flag, followed by the data in the record. An optional workarea can be specified, otherwise the current workarea will be usedExample
use backup in 0
use accounts in 0
nrecs=reccount()
for i = 1 to nrecs
if rtos(accounts) != rtos(backup)
debug("record "+recno()+" don't match")
endif
next
Recital is a dynamic programming language with an embedded high performance database engine particularly well suited for the development and deployment of high transaction throughput applications.
The Recital database engine is not a standalone process with which the application program communicates. Instead, the Recital database is an integral part of any applications developed in Recital.
Recital implements most of the SQL-99 standard for SQL, but also provides lower level navigational data access for performing high transaction throughput. It is the choice of the application developer whether to use SQL, navigational data access, or a combination of both depending upon the type of application being developed.
The Recital database engine, although operating as an embedded database in the user process, multiple users and other background processes may access the same data concurrently. Read accesses are satisfied in parallel. Recital uses automatic record level locking when performing database updates. This provides for a high degree of database concurrency and superior application performance and differentiates the Recital database from other embeddable databases such as sqlite that locks the entire database file during writing.
Key features of the Recital scripting language include:
- High performance database application scripting language
- Modern object-oriented language features
- Easy to learn, easy to use
- Fast, just-in-time compiled
- Loosely-typed
- Garbage collected
- Static arrays, Associative arrays and objects
- Develop desktop or web applications
- Cross-platform support
- Extensive built-in functions
- Superb built-in SQL command integration
- Navigational data access for the most demanding applications
- Scripting language is upward compatible with FoxPRO
Key features of the Recital database include:
- A broad subset of ANSI SQL 99, as well as extensions
- Cross-platform support
- Stored procedures
- Triggers
- Cursors
- Updatable Views
- System Tables
- Query caching
- Sub-SELECTs (i.e. nested SELECTs)
- Embedded database library
- Fault tolerant clustering support
- Chronological data versioning with database timelines
- Optional DES3 encrypted data
- Hot backup
- Client drivers for ODBC, JDBC and .NET
Key features of the Recital database include:
- SQL-92 and a broad subset of ANSI SQL 99, as well as extensions
- Cross-platform support
- Stored procedures
- Triggers
- Cursors
- Updatable Views
- System Tables
- Query caching
- High-performance
- Single-User and Multi-User
- Multi-Process
- ACID Transactions
- Referential Integrity
- Cascading Updates and Deletes
- Multi-table Joins
- Row-level Locking
- BLOBs (Binary Large Objects)
- UDFs (User Defined Functions)
- OLTP (On-Line Transaction Processing)
- Drivers for ODBC, JDBC, and .NET
- Sub-SELECTs (i.e. nested SELECTs)
- Embedded database library
- Database timelines providing data undo functionality
- Fault tolerant clustering support
- Hot backup
It would appear that gigabit LAN is not! In fact it often runs at the same speed as 100Mbps LAN. Let's look at why exactly.
After configuring your network you can use the ifconfig command to see what speeds the LAN is connected. Even though 1000Mbps is reported by the card, the reality is that the overall throughtput may well be ~100Mpbs. You can try copying a large file using scp to demonstrate this.
As it turns out, in order to use a gigabit LAN you need to use CAT6 cables. CAT5 and CAT5E are not good enough. End result, the ethernet cards throttle back the speed to reduce dropped packets and errors.
You can find a good article here titled Squeeze Your Gigabit NIC for Top Performance. After tuning up the TCP parameters i found that it made no dfifference. The principal reasons behind low gigabit ethernet performance can be summed up as follows.
- Need to use CAT6 cables
- Slow Disk speed
- Limitations of the PCI bus which the gigabit ethernet cards use
You can get an idea about the disk speed using the hdparm command:
Display the disk partitions and choose the main linux partition which has the / filesystem.
# fdisk -l
Then get disk cache and disk read statistics:
# hdparm -Tt /dev/sda0
On my desktop system the sata disk perfomance is a limiting factor. These were the results:
/dev/sda1:
Timing cached reads: 9984 MB in 2.00 seconds = 4996.41 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 84 MB in 3.13 seconds = 58.49 MB/sec
Well, that equates to a raw disk read speed of 58.49 * 8 = 467Mbps which is half the speed of a gigabit LAN.
So.. NAS storage with lots of memory looks to be the way to go... If you use the right cables!
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc351024(VS.85).aspx
try
open database southwind
catch
die("Cannot open database, please try later.")
endtry